The previous contract between these two legal entities was originally signed in 2013, and two Annex contracts were signed by 2016, and the new contract was signed for a period of 15 years, i.e. until 2036.

It is a business space (catering facility), the former “Jova bar” located in the center of Banja Luka, and a summer garden, which is located next to the building, and the monthly rent is 4,100 KM + VAT, which for the contract period represents about 670,000 KM.

Millions of profit to Jović from subletting other people's property

Only a few months after signing the contract, the owner of the company Bosna Impex, Banja Luka businessman Milutin Jović, subleased this office space to a third party, sports betting company Maxbet, for a price of 14,400 KM per month, according to information from Gerila.

By the way, the previous contract had a term of validity until 2026, it gave the possibility of subletting, and according to its items, the rent price was 3,500 KM per month, plus VAT, and another 3,500 KM was kept as the participation of the mentioned company through the process of construction and adaptation of the building and office space.

According to a simple calculation, Jović will collect approximately 1.68 million marks by subleasing the office space in the next 14 years, and SRD Banjaluka says that the Management Board did not have the consent or the authority to sign a new contract.

“The board of directors of SRD Banja Luka is the administrative body of the association, therefore the executive, but it has taken authority to disrespect other bodies, which are higher than it. The Statute is not respected, there is no rebalancing of the spending plan. I consider the contract that was concluded to be harmful, and it was not presented to the members of the Assembly at all. It was signed in November 2021, and in the report for that mentioned year there is only one sentence, good cooperation with the company Bosna impex. That's all that is said”, a source from SRD Banjaluka told Gerila.

This picture is stated in the report of the Supervisory Board of the Association for the year 2022.

“When it comes to the previous tenant of the office space, Bosna impex, we must state that the Contract OPU 88/2013 with Annex 1 and Annex 2 of the same contract concluded on 30.10.2013. terminated and concluded the new contract on the lease of business premises on November 23, 2021”, the report states, with notes that there are numerous deviations compared to the previous period.

“The Supervisory Board believes that there are certain deviations from the OPU 88/2013 Agreement with Annexes and irregularities in the Agreement, which was concluded on November 23, 2021, which relate to the duration of the lease board, rent and payment terms, termination of the agreement and subleasing premises, which are defined in the new contract for the lease of business premises”, the report adds.

The President of the Supervisory Board, Dušan Jovandić, told Gerila that the Supervisory Board simply stated the factual situation.

“Yes, that is our report. We were given the task as the Supervisory Board, that is our role, to supervise the work of the Banjaluka Sports and Fishing Society. It is also a legal obligation. We are obliged to analyze everything and submit it to the Board of Directors. We are an independent and autonomous body within the company that supervises the legality and intended use and disposal of the company's funds and controls financial and material operations”, says Jovandić.

He also notes that the company's bodies are obliged to enable the Supervisory Board to work smoothly and view all the documentation related to the business, however, they were denied certain documentation by the Management Board, and that they received a part of the documents after the intervention of Pero Pejinović, the president Assemblies of associations.

“We observed numerous illegalities and irregularities. We put that in the report, however, now we have information that they are trying to avoid the report at the annual session of the Assembly scheduled for June 29, they are lobbying the Assembly delegates to reject this report and replace the current Supervisory Board. I think that the police and the public prosecutor should be involved in this, that the audit should also be involved, that an investigation should be conducted into the legality of the work”, said Jovandić.

He adds that the Statute of the Association stipulates that the Assembly of the Society decides on the management and disposal of assets, and that the Assembly authorizes the Board of Directors to manage assets without the right of disposal, and that this is also stated in a legal opinion.

“When preparing our report, we had to consult a lawyer, so that they would know if it was illegal actions. Here it is written that since the office space is immovable property, i.e. it is indisputably part of the company's property, and since the Board of Directors did not have statutory powers or the decision of the Assembly authorizing the Board of Directors to conclude contracts, it concludes that they did not have the authority to do so. He also notes that this type of contract does not produce a legal effect for the company because it was concluded by an unauthorized person”, adds Jovandić.

The President of the Assembly of the Association Pero Pejinović briefly confirmed for Gerila that he does not know the details of the new contract with the company Bosna impex, that this contract was not on the agenda of the Assembly, but that all information about the operations of SRD Banjaluka, signed contracts and disputes are requested from the president Dragan Petrušić of the Board of Directors, who is the person authorized to represent the Company.

Nevertheless, Pejinović adds, he is aware that in the past period the procedures were not respected when it comes to the work of the Association, and that he agrees with what the Supervisory Board put in its report.

“The Statute of the Association defined how it must be done and what are the responsibilities of whom. The work of the Supervisory Board must be respected, and I stand behind the fact that the Supervisory Board did its job well”, said Pejinović.

On the other hand, Dragan Petrušić, the president of the Board of Directors and the person whose signature appears on the new contract with the company Bosna impex, did not want to answer our questions. Originally he said to send him the questions by mail.

“Please, so that I don't have to give you a statement from the car, send official questions to the email. I am not competent for that. There are people who worked on it, don't let me give you statements from the car, so that it is officially taken out of context. The one who gave you that information has nothing to do with the relationship, so I will give you the lawyer who worked on it”, Petrušić told the Gerila journalist.

However, even after sending the questions, SRD Banjaluka still did not answer our questions.

“We inform you that the questions to which you are looking for an answer have been forwarded to the competent commission of the Banja Luka Sports Fishing Society. Also, we inform you that you will receive answers to the same questions within the legally stipulated period”, they state in SRD Banjaluka.

In addition to the questions about the aforementioned contract, we also asked the SRD Banjaluka to give us answers from the Association to the other disputed matters contained in the report of the Supervisory Board, including the claims of individual fishermen that certain members of the Management Board are in a conflict of interest, that is, whether one of the members of the Management Board, a lawyer who represents the SRD of Banjaluka in court proceedings.

The Supervisory Board noted a deficit in business, as well as an unpaid claim

According to the financial reports, the Sports fishing company reported a loss in business of 16,032 KM, which was also stated in the report of the Supervisory Board.

“Analyzing the available documentation, the Supervisory Board determined that there is a significant value of disputed claims in the Company that have not been adequately valued. Analyzing the positions of receivables from the analytical card for the observed period, it is concluded that there are items that have been maintained without any change for more than three years”, the report states.

In addition, it is added that they could not determine whether all court judgments have been identified in bookkeeping, as well as the exact number of disputes led by the Company or led against the Company, for the reason that the Commission for Legal and General Issues did not submit its report.

“We emphasize the incompleteness of the information on the state of all court cases. We especially highlight and point to the court case related to the dispute with Betongradnja-Vidović, because on October 5, 2012, a lawsuit was filed for compensation for damages due to the death of fish in Dragočajska Rijeka in the amount of 100,000 KM.”

The Supervisory Board concluded that the Management Board did not have the authority to make individual decisions on costs that deviate from the adopted annual plan.

Lake Manjača – another unanswered question

Gerila sources say that there are still some disputed matters in the work of SRD Banjaluka. One of them is the collection of tickets for the regulation of fishing and the collection of tickets on Lake Manjača.

“SRD Banjaluka signed a contract with the Center for Village Development and Improvement, however, water disposal, access to fishermen and fishing is determined by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management, which signs a contract with fishing associations for each water surface. Secondly, it is prescribed that the permit form must be in accordance with the Rulebook on the Form, Content and Form of Fishing Permits, and we have information that permits are being sold that were not issued by the Ministry but distributed by the Fishing Association of the RS”, says one of the fishermen from RSD Banjaluka.

Although we also sent these questions to the address of SRD Banjaluka, and the relevant Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management, we still have not received a single answer.

Gerila.info

The post Secret contracts in the net of Banja Luka fishermen first appeared on Gerila.info.

PIŠE: Istraživački tim GERILA

Prethodni ugovor između ova dva pravna lica prvobitno je potpisan 2013.godine, te su do 2016.godine potpisana i dva Anexa ugovora, a novi ugovor potpisan je na period od  15 godina, odnosno do 2036 godine.

Riječ je o poslovnom prostoru (ugostiteljskom objektu), nekadašnji „Jova bar“ koji se nalazi u centru Banjaluke, te ljetnoj bašti, koja se nalazi uz objekat, a mjesečna cijena zakupnine je 4100 KM + PDV, što za ugovorni period predstavlja oko 670 hiljada KM.

Milionska dobit Joviću od davanja u podzakup tuđe imovine

Samo nekoliko mjeseci nakon potpisivanja ugovora, vlasnik preduzeća Bosna Impex, banjalučki privrednik Milutin Jović, dao je ovaj poslovni prostor u podzakup trećem licu, sportskoj kladionici Maxbet, a prema informaciji Gerile, za cijenu od 14.400 KM mjesečno.

Inače, prethodni ugovor imao je rok trajanja do 2026.godine, nje davao mogućnost podzakupljivanja, a prema njegovim stavkama, cijena zakupnine bila je 3.500 KM mjesečno, plus PDV, te se još 3.500 KM vodilo kao učešće pomenutog preduzeća kroz proces izgradnje i adaptacije zgrade i poslovnog prostora.

Prema prostoj računici, Jović će davanjem u podzakup poslovnog prostora u narednih 14 godina inkasirati približno 1,68 miliona maraka, a u SRD Banjaluka kažu da Upravni odbor nije imao saglasnost, ni ovlaštenje da potpiše novi ugovor.

„Upravni odbor SRD Banjaluke je upravni organ udruženja, dakle izvršni, ali je uzeo sebi ingerencije da ne poštuje ostale organe, koji su viši od njega. Ne poštuje se Statut, nema rebalansa plana potrošnje. Ugovor koji je sklopljen, smatram da je štetan, a članovima Skupštine uopšte nije prezentovan. On je potpisan u novembru 2021.godine, a u izvještaju za tu pomenutu godinu stoji samo jedna rečenica, dobra saradnja sa preduzećem Bosna impex. To je sve što se kaže“, kaže za Gerilu izvor iz SRD Banjaluka.

Ovakva slika se konstatuje i u izvještaju Nadzornog odbora Udruženja za 2022. godinu.

„Kada je iu pitanju dosadašnji zakupac poslovnog prostora Bosna impex, moramo konstatovati da je  Ugovor  OPU 88/2013 sa Anex 1 i Anex 2 istog ugovora koji je zaključen  30.10.20.13. prekinut i zajključen novi ugovor o zakupu poslovnih prostorija 23.11.2021.godine“, stoji u izvještaju, uz napomene da spostoje brojna odstupanja u odnosu na prethodni period.

„Nadzorni odbor smatra da postoje određena odstupanja i od Ugovora OPU 88/2013 sa Anexima i nepravilnosti u Ugovoru, koji je zaključen 23.11.2021.godine, a koji se odnose na rok trajanja zakupnog odbora, zakupnina i rokovi plaćanja, prestanak važenja ugovora i davanje prostorija u podzakup, a koji su definisani u novom Ugovoru u zakupu poslovnih prostora“, dodaje se u izvještaju.

Predsjednik Nadzornog odbora Dušan Jovandić izjavio je za Gerilu da je Nadzorni odbor prosto konstatovao činjenično stanje.

„Da, to jeste naš izvještaj. Mi smo dobili zadatak kao Nadzorni odbor, to jeste naša uloga, da uradimo nadzor nad radom sportsko-ribolovnog društva Banjaluka. To je i zakonska obaveza. Mi smo dužni i obavezno da sve analiziramo i dostavimo Upravnom odboru. Mi smo nezavisni i samostalni organ unutar društva koji vrši nadzor nad zakonitošću i namjenskim korištenjem i raspolaganjem sredstava društva i vrši kontrolu finansijskog i materijalnog poslovanja“, kaže Jovandić.

Napominje i da su organi društva dužni da Nadzornom odboru omogući nesmetan rad i uvid u svu dokumentaciju koja je vezana za poslovanje, međutim, bili su od strane Upravnog odbora uskraćeni za određenu dokumentaciju, te da su dobili jedan dio dokumenata nakon intervencije Pere Pejinovića, predsjednika Skupštine udruženja.

„Mi smo uočili brojne nezakonitosti i nepravilnosti. To smo stavili u izvještaj, međutim, evo sad imamo informaciju, da pokušavaju na godišnjoj sjednici Skupštine koja je zakazana za 29.jun da bi izbjegli izvještaj, lobiraju sa delegatima Skupštine da odbaci ovaj izvještaj i smijene trenutni Nadzorni odbor. Mislim da se u ovo sad trebaju uključiti i SUP i javni tužilac, da se uključi i revizija, da se povede istraga, o zakonitosti rada“, rekao je Jovandić.

Dodaje i da je Statut Udruženja odredio da Skupština društva odlučuje o upravljanju i raspolaganju imovinom, ta da Skupština daje ovlaštenja Upravnom odboru da upravlja imovinom bez prava raspolaganje, te da je to navedeno i u jednom pravnom mišljenju.

„Morali smo prilikom izrade svog izvještaja da konsultujemo pravnika, da bi znali da li je riječ o nezakonitim radnjama. Ovdje piše da kako je poslovni prostor nepokretnost, odnosno nesporno spada u imovinu društva i kako Upravni odbor nije imao statutarna ovlaštenja ili odluku Skupštine kojom se daju ovlaštenja Upravnom odboru za zaključenje ugovora, zaključuje da oni nisu imali ovlaštenje da to urade. Napominje i  da ovakav ugovor ne proizvodi pravnodejstvo za društvo jer je zaključen od strane neovlaštenog lica“, dodaje Jovandić.

Predsjednik Skupštine Udruženja Pero Pejinović kratko je potvrdio za Gerilu da on ne zna za pojedinosti novog ugovora sa preduzećem Bosna impex, da se taj ugovor nije nalazio na Dnevnom redu Skupštine, ali da sve informacije o poslovanju SRD Banjaluka, potpisanim ugovorima i sporovima tražimo od predsjednika Upravnog odbora Dragana Petrušića, koji je lice koje ovlašteno za zastupanje Društva.

Ipak, dodaje Pejinović, svjestan je da u proteklom periodu nisu poštovane procedure kada je riječ o radu Udruženja, te da je saglasan sa onim što je Nadzorni odbor stavio u svom izvještaju.

„Statut Udruženja je definisao kako se mora raditi i koje su čije nadležnosti. Mora se poštovati rad Nadzornog odbora  i ja stojim iza toga da je Nadzorni odbor dobro uradio svoj posao“, rekao je Pejinović.

S druge strane, Dragan Petrušić, predsjednik Upravnog odbora i osoba čiji potpis stoji na novom Ugovoru sa preduzećem Bosna impex, nije htio da odgovori na naša pitanja. Prvobitno je rekao da mu pošaljemo pitanja na mail.

„Molim vas, da vam ja sad ne bih iz auta davao izjavu, pošaljite zvanično pitanja na mail. Ja za to nisam kompetentan. Imaju ljudi koji su radili na tome, nemojte da vam ja sad ja iz auta dajem izjave, pa da se to zvanično izvlači iz konteksta. Onaj koji vam je te informacije dao, nemaju veze s vezom, pa ću vam ja dati pravnika koji je radio na tome“, rekao je Petrušić novinaru Gerile.

Ipak, ni nakon poslatih pitanja, iz SRD Banjaluka još uvijek nisu odgovorili na naša pitanja.

“Obavještavamo Vas da su pitanja na koja tražite odgovor prosljeđena nadležnoj komisiji Sportsko ribolovnog društva Banja Luka. Takođe, obavještavamo Vas da ćete odgovore na ista  pitanja dobiti u zakonski predviđenom roku”, navode u SRD Banjaluka.

Uz pitanja o pomenutom ugovoru, od SRD Banjaluka tražili smo i da nam iz Udruženja odgovore i na ostale sporne stvari koje se nalaze  izvještaju Nadzornog odbora, tkao i tvrdnji pojedinih ribolovaca da se pojedini članovi Upravnog odbora nalaze u sukobu interesa, to jeste da li je jedan od članova Upravnog odbora advokat koji zastupa SRD Banjaluka u sudskim procesima.

Nadzorni odbor konstatovao i minus u poslovanju, ali i neplaćeno potraživanje

Sportsko ribolovno društvo je prema finansijskim izvještajima iskazalo gubitak u poslovanju od 16.032 KM, što je konstatovano i u izvještaju Nadzornog odbora.

„Analizirajući dostupnu dokumentaciju Nadzorni odbor je utvrdio i  da u Društvu postoji značajna vrijednost  spornih potraživanja koja nisu adekvatno vrednovana. Analizom pozicija potraživanja iz analitičke kartice za posmatrani period, zaključuje se da postoje stavke koje se bez bilo kakve promjene vode više od tri godine“, stoji u izvještaju.

Uz to, dodaje se i da nisu mogli utvrditi da li su sve sudske presude eveidentirane knjigovodstveno kao i tačan broj sporova koje vodi Društvo ili se vode protiv Društva, iz razloga što Komisija za pravna i opšta pitanja nije dostavila svoj izvještaj.

„Ističemo nekompletnost informacije o stanju svih sudskih predmeta. Posebno ističemo i ukazujemo na sudski predmet koji se odnosi na spor sa Betongradnja- Vidović, jer je dana 05.10.2012.godine, podnijeta tužba za naknadu štete usljed pomora ribe u Dragočajskoj rijeci u iznosu od 100.000 KM“

Nadzorni odbor je konstatovao i da Upravni odbor nije imao nadležnost da donosi pojedinačne odluke o troškovimakojima se odstupa od usvojenog godišnjeg plana.

Jezero Manjača- još jedno pitanje bez odgovora

Izvori Gerile kažu da postoje još neke sporne stvari u radu SRD Banjaluka. Jedno od njih je naplaćivanje karata za regulisanje ribolova i naplaćivanje karata na jezeru Manjača.

„SRD Banjaluka je potpisao ugovor sa Centrom za razvoj i unapređenje sela, međutim, raspolaganje vodom, pristup ribarima i ribarenje određuje Minnistrastvo poljoprivrede šumarstva i vodoprivrede, koje potpisuje ugovor sa ribolovačkim udruženjima za svaku vodnu površinu. Drugo, propisano je da obrazac dozvole mora biti u skladu sa Pravilnikom o obliku, sadržaju i obrazcu dozvole za ribolov, a mi imamo informacije da se prodaju dozvole koje nije izdalo Ministarstvo a distribuirao Ribolovni  savez RS”, kaže jedan od ribolovaca iz RSD Banjaluka.

Iako smo I ova pitanj poslali na adresu SRD Banjaluka, a i resornog Ministarstva poljoprivrede, šumarstva I vodoprivrede, još uvijek nismo dobili nijedan odgovor.

The post Tajni ugovori u mreži banjalučkih ribolovaca first appeared on Gerila.info.